Cucharmoy (Seine-et-Marne, France) - Sainte-Geneviève
- Disclaimer
The dating found here is based on the work of John James, and is meant on this site to serve as a starting point. James' dating is derived from a system that uses his interpretation of the development of capitals over time as the basis for chronology, among other factors. His goal is to refine the dating to within years rather than decades. I have not fully embraced James' methodology, and will be developing this page from its current state to one which is admittedly more conservative. The relative expenditure values found in the Timeline are also based on James' work, and I believe these to be reasonably reliable. They are intended only to give a sense of the amount of work involved in each decade.
I have added the idea of the "project" as a way of separating work in buildings. In my mind, a "project" is a discrete section of work in a building that resulted from the one-time acquisition of funding. "Projects" are generally separated by at least a decade where no work was being done. It is my view that it would have been unwise to start a "project" that could not be finished and protected from the elements, and as such a "project" usually involved a wing or multiple wings of a building, from floor to roof. Rural churches, which could only secure small amounts of funding at irregular intervals, often were the result of many small projects, while the great churches, which benefitted from relatively consistent funding, may have involved only a few large projects.
I have added the idea of the "project" as a way of separating work in buildings. In my mind, a "project" is a discrete section of work in a building that resulted from the one-time acquisition of funding. "Projects" are generally separated by at least a decade where no work was being done. It is my view that it would have been unwise to start a "project" that could not be finished and protected from the elements, and as such a "project" usually involved a wing or multiple wings of a building, from floor to roof. Rural churches, which could only secure small amounts of funding at irregular intervals, often were the result of many small projects, while the great churches, which benefitted from relatively consistent funding, may have involved only a few large projects.
- Timeline with Relative Expenditure (if available, in building units)
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Project A - 1120s - Phase 1 - w crossing
West crossing arch, only piers remain. Later wall north aisle with two recesses.
- Project B - 1190s - Phase 2 - n nave
Middle north bay W1 shafts and pointed arch.
- Project B - 1200s - Phase 3 - WN1
WN1 arch added over shaft to drum on WN2. Drum itself is not dateable.
- Project B - 1210s - Phase 4 - east
East two bays with octagonal caps, double windows and vaults with peaked arches; shafts were added over north wall with extension of one bay to the east, with capitals of simple forms in a very hard stone, could be 1180s to 1220s, and since there are octagonal forms I suggest after 1210; the squashed bases also suggest the later date; the aisle vaults heavier than those in the apse.