May-en-Multien (Seine-et-Marne, France) - Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption
- Disclaimer
The dating found here is based on the work of John James, and is meant on this site to serve as a starting point. James' dating is derived from a system that uses his interpretation of the development of capitals over time as the basis for chronology, among other factors. His goal is to refine the dating to within years rather than decades. I have not fully embraced James' methodology, and will be developing this page from its current state to one which is admittedly more conservative. The relative expenditure values found in the Timeline are also based on James' work, and I believe these to be reasonably reliable. They are intended only to give a sense of the amount of work involved in each decade.
I have added the idea of the "project" as a way of separating work in buildings. In my mind, a "project" is a discrete section of work in a building that resulted from the one-time acquisition of funding. "Projects" are generally separated by at least a decade where no work was being done. It is my view that it would have been unwise to start a "project" that could not be finished and protected from the elements, and as such a "project" usually involved a wing or multiple wings of a building, from floor to roof. Rural churches, which could only secure small amounts of funding at irregular intervals, often were the result of many small projects, while the great churches, which benefitted from relatively consistent funding, may have involved only a few large projects.
I have added the idea of the "project" as a way of separating work in buildings. In my mind, a "project" is a discrete section of work in a building that resulted from the one-time acquisition of funding. "Projects" are generally separated by at least a decade where no work was being done. It is my view that it would have been unwise to start a "project" that could not be finished and protected from the elements, and as such a "project" usually involved a wing or multiple wings of a building, from floor to roof. Rural churches, which could only secure small amounts of funding at irregular intervals, often were the result of many small projects, while the great churches, which benefitted from relatively consistent funding, may have involved only a few large projects.
- Timeline with Relative Expenditure (if available, in building units)
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Project A - 1080s - Phase 1 - apse
Apse single bay with double shafts up to just under the windows; is it possible that the large shafts on the south side of the south piers are of the same period?
- Project B - 1140s - Phase 2 - apse n1-2
Apse two bays north side within earlier walls with capitals and vaults
- Project B - 1150s - Phase 3 - nave 1 (a)
Next two bays with bases to doors to the north
- Project B - 1150s - Phase 4 - nave 1 (c)
Capitals and vaults
- Project B - 1150s - Phase 5 - nave 2 (a)
Western two bays includes completion of both the north and western doors
- Project B - 1150s - Phase 6 - nave n3-4 (c)
Capitals and vaults
- Project C - 1190s - Phase 7 - south
Two apse bays added on the south to create a hall church.
- Project D - Later - Phase 8 -
Replaced arches and extend church to the south; then what of south shafts on south side of 1080s piers? uncertainty around what was the state of the C12 church.